Evaluating synthetic computed tomography images for adaptive radiotherapy decision making in head and neck cancer

Publication Name

Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology

Abstract

Background and purpose: Adaptive radiotherapy (ART) decision-making benefits from dosimetric information to supplement image inspection when assessing the significance of anatomical changes. This study evaluated a dosimetry-based clinical decision workflow for ART utilizing deformable registration of the original planning computed tomography (CT) image to the daily Cone Beam CT (CBCT) to replace the need for a replan CT for dose estimation. Materials and methods: We used 12 retrospective Head & Neck patient cases having a ground truth – a replan CT (rCT) in response to anatomical changes apparent in the daily CBCT – to evaluate the accuracy of dosimetric assessment conducted on synthetic CTs (sCT) generated by deforming the original planning CT Hounsfield Units to the daily CBCT anatomy. The original plan was applied to the sCT and dosimetric accuracy of the sCT was assessed by analyzing plan objectives for targets and organs-at-risk compared to calculations on the ground-truth rCT. Three commercial DIR algorithms were compared. Results: For the best-performing algorithms, the majority of dose metrics calculated on the sCTs differed by less than 4 Gy (5.7% of 70 Gy prescription dose). An uncertainty of ±2.5 Gy (3.6% of 70 Gy prescription) is recommended as a conservative tolerance when evaluating dose metrics on sCTs for head and neck. Conclusions: Synthetic CTs present a valuable addition to the adaptive radiotherapy workflow, and synthetic CT dose estimates can be effectively used in addition to the current practice of visually inspecting the overlay of the planning CT and CBCT to assess the significance of anatomical change.

Open Access Status

This publication is not available as open access

Volume

27

Article Number

100478

Funding Sponsor

Peter MacCallum Foundation

Share

COinS
 

Link to publisher version (DOI)

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2023.100478