THE NATURE AND PURPOSE OF COMPLAINANT INTOXICATION EVIDENCE IN RAPE TRIALS: A STUDY OF AUSTRALIAN APPELLATE COURT DECISIONS

Publication Name

Adelaide Law Review

Abstract

This article reports the findings of a qualitative analysis of 102 Australian appellate court decisions involving conviction appeals from rape/sexual assault trials, where there was evidence that the complainant was intoxicated at the time of the alleged offence. We found little evidence that statutory provisions designed to break the traditionally assumed nexus between alcohol (and other drug) consumption and consent to sex are influencing trials. It appears to be the case that complainant intoxication evidence is still more likely to impede rather than support the prosecution’s ability to prove the element of non­consent — because it is engaged by the defence to: suggest consent based on a ‘loss of inhibition’ narrative; and/or challenge the credibility of the complainant as a witness and the reliability of their account.

Open Access Status

This publication is not available as open access

Volume

43

Issue

2

First Page

606

Last Page

640

Funding Number

DP200100101

Funding Sponsor

Australian Research Council

This record is in the process of being updated. Please contact us for more information.

Share

COinS