Mechanisms of traumatic injury to the shoulder girdle in the Australian Football League

RIS ID

136582

Publication Details

Schwab, L. M., McGrath, T., Franettovich Smith, M. M., Mendis, M. D., McGhee, D. & Hides, J. (2019). Mechanisms of traumatic injury to the shoulder girdle in the Australian Football League. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 22 (9), 987-991.

Abstract

Objective

To investigate mechanisms of shoulder girdle injuries and their impact on players from the Australian Football League (AFL).

Design

Retrospective video analysis.

Methods

Two experienced sports physiotherapists (>10 years) examined video footage of shoulder complex injuries that occurred in the 2015 premiership season. Information obtained from video footage included activity prior to injury; mechanism of injury; arm, head and neck position and point of body contact at the time of injury. Player demographics and injury characteristics were obtained from club and media data.

Results

The most common mechanism of injury was lateral contact (34.6%) followed by hyperflexion/ abduction of the shoulder (19.2%). Glenohumeral joint (GHJ) dislocations and subluxations were the most frequent diagnosis for all mechanisms of injury, and occurred in a variety of shoulder positions. Over 80% of injuries occurred with the arm below 100° of shoulder flexion or abduction. The most common activity prior to injury was ‘ball in dispute’ (34.6%). Lateral contact injuries had the highest overall severity (two-thirds of players missed >3 games) and over 50% of shoulder injuries required surgery. Players missed on average 5.1 season games due to shoulder injury.

Conclusion

The lateral contact mechanism was the most common and severe mechanism of shoulder injury. Improved understanding of shoulder girdle injury mechanisms can help guide the use of preventative strategies and injury management programs in elite AFL players.

Please refer to publisher version or contact your library.

Share

COinS
 

Link to publisher version (DOI)

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2019.05.019