New South Wales and Australian Capital Territory Researcher Development Program 2005-07: Modest investment, considerable outcomes

Authors

Helen Cameron, University of Sydney - Broken Hill Department of Rural Health
Frances T. Boreland, University of Sydney - Broken Hill Department of Rural Health
Jocelyn Morris, University of Sydney - Broken Hill Department of Rural Health
David Lyle, University of Sydney - Broken Hill Department of Rural Health
David A. Perkins, University of Sydney - Broken Hill Department of Rural HealthFollow
Parker Magin, University of Newcastle
Melanie Marshall, University of New South Wales
Nicholas Arnold Zwar, University of New South WalesFollow

RIS ID

111933

Publication Details

Cameron, H., Boreland, F., Morris, J., Lyle, D., Perkins, D., Magin, P., Marshall, M. & Zwar, N. (2013). New South Wales and Australian Capital Territory Researcher Development Program 2005-07: Modest investment, considerable outcomes. Australian Journal of Primary Health, 19 (1), 59-67.

Abstract

This evaluation of the Researcher Development Program (RDP) in NSW and ACT aimed to determine whether the RDP was effective in assisting novice researchers to undertake primary health care research. In mid-2008, 47 participants of the NSW and ACT RDP during 2005-07 were invited to participate in a postal survey. The survey included questions regarding previous research training and experience, outcomes during and after participation in the program, and organisational aspects of the program. Follow-up interviews were conducted with selected participants. Interview questions covered time in the program, supervision, organisational support and placement outcomes. Thirty-seven participants responded to the survey and 23 (62%) participants took part in the semi-structured interviews. Seventy-eight per cent of survey respondents felt that the RDP helped them move from novice to a more experienced researcher with effective supervision identified by participants as a key element in determining the success of the program. Many felt that time allocation was inadequate and 20% thought their capacity to maintain their workload was adversely affected by participating. Outcomes were considerable given the modest nature of the program. Notable outcomes were that most participants published their research and presented their research at a conference. Furthermore, one-fifth of survey respondents had enrolled in higher degrees. Several interviewees reported that their research led to changes in practice. Most respondents found the RDP valuable and considered that undertaking the program increased their research knowledge. 2013 La Trobe University.