RIS ID

111824

Publication Details

Stanley, A. J., Hasan, I., Crockett, A. J., Van Schayck, O. CP. & Zwar, N. A. (2014). COPD Diagnostic Questionnaire (CDQ) for selecting at-risk patients for spirometry: A cross-sectional study in Australian general practice. npj Primary Care Respiratory Medicine, 24 14024-1-14024-5.

Abstract

Background: Using the COPD Diagnostic Questionnaire (CDQ) as a selection tool for spirometry could potentially improve the efficiency and accuracy of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) diagnosis in at-risk patients. Aim: To identify an optimal single cut point for the CDQ that divides primary care patients into low or high likelihood of COPD, with the latter group undergoing spirometry. Methods: Former or current smokers aged 40-85 years with no prior COPD diagnosis were invited to a case-finding appointment with the practice nurse at various general practices in Sydney, Australia. The CDQ was collected and pre- and post-bronchodilator spirometry was performed. Cases with complete CDQ data and spirometry meeting quality standards were analysed (1,054 out of 1,631 patients). CDQ cut points were selected from a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Results: The area under the ROC curve was 0.713. A cut point of 19.5 had the optimal combination of sensitivity (63%) and specificity (70%) with two-thirds below this cut point. A cut point of 14.5 corresponded to a sensitivity of 91%, specificity of 35% and negative predictive value of 96%, and 31% of patients below this cut point. Conclusions: The CDQ can be used to select patients at risk of COPD for spirometry using one cut point. We consider two possible cut points. The 19.5 cut point excludes a higher proportion of patients from undergoing spirometry with the trade-off of more false negatives. The 14.5 cut point has a high sensitivity and negative predictive value, includes more potential COPD cases but has a higher rate of false positives. 2014 Primary Care Respiratory Society UK/Macmillan Publishers Limited.

Share

COinS
 

Link to publisher version (DOI)

http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/npjpcrm.2014.24