The effects of thoracic load carriage on maximal ambulatory work tolerance and acceptable work durations
RIS ID
106355
Abstract
Purpose Torso loads restrict chest-wall movement and ventilation, particularly during heavy exercise. Therefore, the differential impact of load carriage and chest-wall restriction was investigated during progressive treadmill exercise. In addition, acceptable work durations were derived across a wide range of submaximal, loaded exercise intensities. Methods Twelve males participated in two research phases. Phase 1: Three incremental treadmill tests until exhaustion [control (clothing only), load carriage (clothing plus 22-kg vest), and clothing with chest strapping]. Phase 2: Five steady-state exercise trials (clothing plus 22-kg vest) at intensities from 30 to 80 % of peak aerobic power to determine maximal acceptable work durations. Results Maximal work tolerance [control 17.21 min (±0.93); loaded 13.44 min (±0.68); strapped 17.00 min (±0.83)] and the mass-specific peak aerobic power [control 61.61 mL kg−1 min−1 (±2.28); loaded 45.42 mL kg−1 min−1 (±1.41); strapped 59.99 mL kg−1 min−1 (±1.61)] were reduced only when loaded (P < 0.05). Peak minute ventilation was retained, although loading and chest strapping reduced the breathing reserve. The lower and upper acceptable work duration derivations when working at the 30 % intensity were 133.40 min (±23.77) and 220.10 min (±48.69), but at 80 % intensity, both durations were reduced to <7 min. Conclusion Thoracic loading significantly reduced exercise tolerance and the breathing reserve, but did not modify peak minute ventilation or the absolute peak aerobic power. Chest strapping, as used herein, exerted minimal impact. However, the projected maximal acceptable work durations were much less than derived using previously published methods.
Publication Details
Peoples, G. E., Lee, D. S., Notley, S. R. & Taylor, N. A.S.. The effects of thoracic load carriage on maximal ambulatory work tolerance and acceptable work durations. European Journal of Applied Physiology. 2016; 116 (3): 635-646.