Replies to Barrett, Corris and Chemero, and Hutto
RIS ID
132503
Abstract
In this essay, I respond to the critical remarks of Louise Barrett, Amanda Corris and Anthony Chemero, and Daniel Hutto on my book Enactivist Interventions. In doing so, I consider whether behaviorism can make a contribution to enactivist theory, whether synergies are the same as dynamical gestalts, and whether the brain can add anything to mathematical reasoning.
Publication Details
Gallagher, S. (2019). Replies to Barrett, Corris and Chemero, and Hutto. Philosophical Studies: an international journal for philosophy in the analytic tradition, 176 (3), 839-851.