Title

Novel amiloride derivatives that inhibit bacterial motility across multiple strains and stator types

Publication Name

Journal of Bacteriology

Abstract

The bacterial flagellar motor (BFM) is a protein complex that confers motility to cells and contributes to survival and virulence. The BFM consists of stators that are ion-selective membrane protein complexes and a rotor that directly connects to a large filament, acting as a propeller. The stator complexes couple ion transit across the membrane to torque that drives rotation of the motor. The most common ion gradients that drive BFM rotation are protons (H+) and sodium ions (Na+). The sodium-powered stators, like those in the PomA/PomB stator complex of Vibrio spp., can be inhibited by sodium channel inhibitors, in particular, by phenamil, a potent and widely used inhibitor. However, relatively few new sodium motility inhibitors have been described since the discovery of phenamil. In this study, we characterized two possible motility inhibitors, HM2-16F and BB2-50F, from a small library of previously reported amiloride derivatives. We used three approaches: effect on rotation of tethered cells, effect on free-swimming bacteria, and effect on rotation of marker beads. We showed that both HM2-16F and BB2-50F stopped rotation of tethered cells driven by Na+ motors comparable to phenamil at matching concentrations and could also stop rotation of tethered cells driven by H+ motors. Bead measurements in the presence and absence of stators confirmed that the compounds did not inhibit rotation via direct association with the stator, in contrast to the established mode of action of phenamil. Overall, HM2-16F and BB2-50F stopped swimming in both Na+ and H+ stator types and in pathogenic and nonpathogenic strains.

Open Access Status

This publication may be available as open access

Volume

203

Issue

22

Article Number

e00367-21

Funding Number

DP190100497

Funding Sponsor

Takeda Science Foundation

Share

COinS
 

Link to publisher version (DOI)

http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JB.00367-21