The antenatal risk questionnaire-revised: Development, use and test-retest reliability in a community sample of pregnant women in Australia
Publication Name
Journal of Affective Disorders
Abstract
Background: Routine psychosocial assessment during pregnancy and the first postnatal year is a public health strategy that prioritises early identification of known risk factors for poor perinatal mental health. We aimed to report on the development and use of the Antenatal Risk Questionnaire-Revised (ANRQ-R), contribute normative data for a community sample of pregnant women and examine its test-retest reliability. Methods: The ANRQ-R was developed in consultation with an expert advisory group. Women completed the ANRQ-R with their midwife at their first antenatal appointment. Test-retest analysis was restricted to women who consented to follow-up and completed a repeat ANRQ-R within four weeks. Results: 7183 women completed the ANRQ-R (total score M = 12.05, Mdn=10; range =5–49). There were some statistically significant differences in total score across maternal age group (χ2=69.75, p<.001), country of birth (χ2=144.01, p<.001) and socioeconomic quintiles (χ2=20.13, p<.001), however the effect sizes of all differences were either small or not clinically significant. Test-retest reliability for the ANRQ-R total score was good (N = 1670; ICC=0.77). Item-level test-retest reliabilities were moderate to good (ICC range=0.65–0.80; kappa coefficient range=0.31–0.74). Limitations: The study was conducted at a single site. Although there was significant diversity in terms of maternal age and country of birth, the majority of participants were partnered and resided in socio-economically advantaged areas, limiting the generalisability of results. Conclusions: This study contributes significant normative data for the ANRQ-R and offers valuable insights for clinicians and researchers working with particular sub-groups of the perinatal population. Additional psychometric examination of the ANRQ-R, including its concurrent and predictive validity, is required.
Open Access Status
This publication is not available as open access
Volume
293
First Page
43
Last Page
50
Funding Sponsor
St John of God Health Care