Authors

Sergey Oshchepkov, National Institute for Environmental Studies,Japan
Andrey Bril, National Institute for Environmental Studies,Japan
Tatsuya Yokota, National Institute for Environmental Studies, Tsukuba, Japan
Isamu Morino, National Institute for Environmental Studies, Tsukuba, Japan
Yukio Yoshida, National Insitute for Environmental Studies, Japan
Tsuneo Matsunaga, National Institute for Environmental Studies,Japan
Dmitry Belikov, National Institute for Environmental Studies,Japan
Debra Wunch, California Institute of Technology
Paul Wennberg, California Institute of Technology
Geoffrey Toon, California Institute of Technology, USA
Christopher O'Dell, Colorado State University
André Butz, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany
Sandrine Guerlet, Netherlands Institute for Space Research, Utrecht, Netherlands
Austin Cogan, University of Leicester
Hartmut Boesch, University of Leicester
Nawo Eguchi, Kiyushu University, Japan
Nicholas Deutscher, University of WollongongFollow
David Griffith, University of WollongongFollow
Ronald MacatangayFollow
Justus Notholt, University of Bremen, Germany
Ralf Sussmann, IMK-IFU, Germany
Markus Rettinger, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Germany
Vanessa Sherlock, National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research, Wellington, New Zealand
John Robinson, National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research, Wellington, New Zealand
Esko Kyro, FMI-Arctic Research Center, Sodankylä, Finland
Pauli Heikkinen, FMI-Arctic Research Center, Sodankylä, Finland
Dietrich G. Feist, Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry
Tomoo Nagahama, Nagoya University, Japan
Nikolay Kadygrov, Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l’Environnement, France.
Shamil Maksyutov, National Institute for Environmental Studies,Japan
Osamu Uchino, National Institute for Environmental Studies, Tsukuba, Japan
Hiroshi Watanabe, National Institute for Environmental Studies,Japan

RIS ID

60294

Publication Details

Oshchepkov, S., Bril, A., Yokota, T., Morino, I., Yoshida, Y., Matsunaga, T., Belikov, D., Wunch, D., Wennberg, P., Toon, G., O'Dell, C., Butz, A., Guerlet, S., Cogan, A., Boesch, H., Eguchi, N., Deutscher, N., Griffith, D., Macatangay, R., Notholt, J., Sussmann, R., Rettinger, M., Sherlock, V., Robinson, J., Kyro, E., Heikkinen, P., Feist, D. G., Nagahama, T., Kadygrow, N., Maksyutov, S., Uchino, O. & Watanabe, H. (2012). Effects of atmospheric light scattering on spectroscopic observations of greenhouse gases from space: Validation of PPDF-based CO 2 retrievals from GOSAT. Journal of Geophysical Research D: Atmospheres, 117 (12), 1-18.

Abstract

This report describes a validation study of Greenhouse gases Observing Satellite (GOSAT) data processing using ground-based measurements of the Total Carbon Column Observing Network (TCCON) as reference data for column-averaged dry air mole fractions of atmospheric carbon dioxide (X CO2). We applied the photon path length probability density function method to validate X CO2 retrievals from GOSAT data obtained during 22months starting from June 2009. This method permitted direct evaluation of optical path modifications due to atmospheric light scattering that would have a negligible impact on ground-based TCCON measurements but could significantly affect gas retrievals when observing reflected sunlight from space. Our results reveal effects of optical path lengthening over Northern Hemispheric stations, essentially from May-September of each year, and of optical path shortening for sun-glint observations in tropical regions. These effects are supported by seasonal trends in aerosol optical depth derived from an offline three-dimensional aerosol transport model and by cirrus optical depth derived from space-based measurements of the Cloud-Aerosol Lidar with Orthogonal Polarization (CALIOP) instrument. Removal of observations that were highly contaminated by aerosol and cloud from the GOSAT data set resulted in acceptable agreement in the seasonal variability of X CO2 over each station as compared with TCCON measurements. Statistical comparisons between GOSAT and TCCON coincident measurements of CO 2 column abundance show a correlation coefficient of 0.85, standard deviation of 1.80ppm, and a sub-ppm negative bias of -0.43ppm for all TCCON stations. Global distributions of monthly mean retrieved X CO2 with a spatial resolution of 2.5° latitude×2.5° longitude show agreement within∼2.5°ppm with those predicted by the atmospheric tracer transport model. © 2012 American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved

Share

COinS
 

Link to publisher version (DOI)

http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2012JD017505