Replies to Barrett, Corris and Chemero, and Hutto

RIS ID

132503

Publication Details

Gallagher, S. (2019). Replies to Barrett, Corris and Chemero, and Hutto. Philosophical Studies: an international journal for philosophy in the analytic tradition, 176 (3), 839-851.

Abstract

In this essay, I respond to the critical remarks of Louise Barrett, Amanda Corris and Anthony Chemero, and Daniel Hutto on my book Enactivist Interventions. In doing so, I consider whether behaviorism can make a contribution to enactivist theory, whether synergies are the same as dynamical gestalts, and whether the brain can add anything to mathematical reasoning.

Please refer to publisher version or contact your library.

Share

COinS
 

Link to publisher version (DOI)

http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11098-018-01234-4