RIS ID

109036

Publication Details

Martin, B. (2016). Public Controversy and Partisan Deliberation. DEMESCI: International Journal of Deliberative Mechanism in Science, 4 (1), 1-21.

Abstract

Public scientific controversies are often the enemy of deliberation, because debating and winning take precedence over an open-minded examination of options. Nevertheless, forms of deliberation do occur throughout controversies, including what can be called "partisan deliberation" in which campaigners on each side of an issue refine and coordinate their respective positions. As well, there are other opportunities for deliberation created by controversies, though the conditions are far from ideal.

Share

COinS
 

Link to publisher version (DOI)

http://dx.doi.org/10.17583/demesci.2016.2181