Home > assh > kunapipi > Vol. 26 (2004) > Iss. 2
Abstract
Modernism is a large, loose, and baggy monster of a term, which struggles to encompass a diverse set of creative practices and cultural assumptions with European origins and a field of reference that has since become unevenly global. I propose to use the example of two writers from outside Europe in order to argue that the tension between artistic modernism and societal modernisation characteristic of European culture in the early part of the twentieth century is reproduced — or, more precisely, transfigured — in postcolonial contexts during the latter half of the twentieth century in differential ways that go beyond the initial correspondence or indebtedness to European forebears.
Recommended Citation
Patke, Rajeev S, Literary modernism in Asia: Pramoedya and kolatkar, Kunapipi, 26(2), 2004.
Available at:https://ro.uow.edu.au/kunapipi/vol26/iss2/5
