Competing priorities: staff perspectives on supporting recovery



Publication Details

Le Boutillier, C., Slade, M., Lawrence, V., Bird, V. J., Chandler, R., Farkas, M., Harding, C., Larsen, J., Oades, L. G., Roberts, G., Shepherd, G., Thornicroft, G., Williams, J. & Leamy, M. (2014). Competing priorities: staff perspectives on supporting recovery. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42 (4), 429-438.


Recovery has come to mean living a life beyond mental illness, and recovery orientation is policy in many countries. The aims of this study were to investigate what staff say they do to support recovery and to identify what they perceive as barriers and facilitators associated with providing recovery-oriented support. Data collection included ten focus groups with multidisciplinary clinicians (n = 34) and team leaders (n = 31), and individual interviews with clinicians (n = 18), team leaders (n = 6) and senior managers (n = 8). The identified core category was Competing Priorities, with staff identifying conflicting system priorities that influence how recovery-oriented practice is implemented. Three sub-categories were: Health Process Priorities, Business Priorities, and Staff Role Perception. Efforts to transform services towards a recovery orientation require a whole-systems approach.

Please refer to publisher version or contact your library.



Link to publisher version (DOI)