University of Wollongong
Browse

Resisting Condescending Research Ethics in Aotearoa/New Zealand

Download (191.48 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2024-11-14, 04:40 authored by Juan Tauri
Recently, Indigenous scholars have raised a number of concerns with the activities of Research Ethics Boards (REBs) and their members, including the preference of REBs for Eurocentric conceptualizations of what does or does not constitute "ethical research conduct", and the privilege accorded liberal notions of the "autonomous individual participant". Informed by the author's refl ections on the REB process, those of Indigenous Canadian and New Zealand research participants, and the extant literature, this paper begins by critiquing the processes employed by New Zealand REBs to assess Indigenous- focused or Indigenous- led research in the criminological realm. The paper ends with a call for Indigenous peoples to resist the condescending ethos of the academy's ethics processes by developing processes that focus on empowering their institutions and communities.

History

Citation

Tauri, J. Marcellus . (2014). Resisting Condescending Research Ethics in Aotearoa/New Zealand. AlterNative: an international journal of indigenous peoples, 10 (2), 134-150.

Journal title

AlterNative: an international journal of indigenous peoples

Volume

10

Issue

2

Pagination

134-150

Language

English

RIS ID

116502

Usage metrics

    Categories

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC