University of Wollongong
Browse

Litigation privilege: transient or timeless? Blank v Canada (Minister of Justice)

Download (705.95 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2024-11-14, 00:20 authored by James Goudkamp
Litigation privilege has become unfashionable. It is under attack on multiple fronts throughout the common law world! In the United Kingdom, perhaps the most notable inroad on the privilege is that made by the House of Lords in Re L (A Minor) (Police Investigation: Privilege).2 In that case it was held that the privilege is an incident of adversarial proceedings and that, consequently, it did not obtain in respect of material generated for the purposes of proceedings that were not predominantly adversarial in nature. There are signs that more radical restrictions are to come. In Three Rivers District Council v Governor and Company of the Bank of England (No. 6) Lord Scott of Foscote foreshadowed that a fundamental reconsideration of litigation privilege may be necessary?

History

Citation

J. Goudkamp, 'Litigation privilege: transient or timeless? Blank v Canada (Minister of Justice)' (2007) 11 (4) International Journal of Evidence and Proof 322-328.

Journal title

The International Journal of Evidence & Proof

Volume

11

Issue

4

Pagination

322-328

Language

English

RIS ID

21699

Usage metrics

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC