University of Wollongong
Browse

Influences on the prediction of conveyor trajectory profiles

Download (236.35 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2024-11-15, 04:46 authored by David HastieDavid Hastie, P W Wypych, Peter ArnoldPeter Arnold
Seven belt conveyor trajectory methods, C.E.M.A., M.H.E.A., Booth, Golka, Korzen, Goodyear, and Dunlop, are presented with their differences explained. Each method uses equations to determine the X and Y coordinates of the trajectory profile. Some methods also use graphical approaches, which allow a quicker determination of the trajectory. Methods such as C.E.M.A., Goodyear, and Dunlop use very few particle properties, while the Korzen method uses many. The parameters used in each method have been investigated to evaluate their impact on the predicted conveyor trajectory. The parameters that showed the most influence are adhesive stress, coefficients of static and kinetic friction, particle shape and size, and divergent coefficients.

History

Citation

Hastie, DB, Wypych, PW & Arnold, PC, Influences on the prediction of conveyor trajectory profiles, Particulate Science and Technology, 28(2), 2010, p 132-145.

Journal title

Particulate Science and Technology

Volume

28

Issue

2

Pagination

132-145

Language

English

RIS ID

33731

Usage metrics

    Categories

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC