University of Wollongong
Browse

Exploring the formal assessment discussions in clinical nursing education: An observational study

journal contribution
posted on 2024-11-17, 15:31 authored by Ingunn Aase, Kristin Akerjordet, Patrick Crookes, Christina T Frøiland, Kristin A Laugaland
Introduction: According to EU standards, 50% of the bachelor education program in nursing should take place in clinical learning environments. Consequently, this calls for high quality supervision, where appropriate assessment strategies are vital to optimize students’ learning, growth, and professional development. Despite this, little is known about the formal assessment discussions taking place in clinical nursing education. Objective: The aim of this study was to explore the characteristics of the formal assessment discussions taking place during first-year students’ clinical education in nursing homes. Method: An exploratory qualitative study was performed. The data consist of passive participant observations of 24 assessment discussions (12 mid-term and 12 final assessments) with first-year nursing students (n=12), their assigned registered nurse mentors (n=12) and nurse educators (n=5). The study was conducted in three public nursing homes in a single Norwegian municipality. Data were subjected to thematic analysis. The findings were reported using the Standards for Reporting of Qualitative Research. Results: Three themes were identified regarding the characteristics of the formal assessment discussions: (1) adverse variability in structuring, weighting of theoretical content and pedagogical approach; (2) limited three-part dialogue constrains feedback and reflection; and (3) restricted grounds for assessment leave the nurse educators with a dominant role. Conclusion: These characteristic signal key areas of attention to improve formal assessment discussions to capitalize on unexploited learning opportunities.

Funding

Réseau de cancérologie Rossy (273558)

History

Journal title

BMC Nursing

Volume

21

Issue

1

Language

English

Usage metrics

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC