University of Wollongong
Browse

Direct to consumer advertising versus disease awareness advertising: Consumer perspectives from down under

Download (161.22 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2024-11-15, 02:18 authored by Danika HallDanika Hall, Sandra JonesSandra Jones, J Hoek
At present, only the United States and New Zealand allow direct-to-consumer advertising (DTCA) of prescription medicine. In other countries where DTCA is not allowed, including Australia and the United Kingdom, pharmaceutical companies undertake disease awareness advertising (DAA). In DAA, advertisements do not name a drug directly, but provide general information about diseases and treatments, and encourage consumers to talk to their doctor. Similar debate surrounds these two forms of advertising, yet while past research has explored consumers' attitudes and behaviour in response to DTCA, little consideration has been given to DAA. This paper compares Australian consumers' perceptions of DAA with New Zealand consumers' perceptions of DTCA. Despite differences in the type and extent of advertising, respondents perceived similar benefits including heightened awareness of treatment options and improved discussions with doctors. New Zealand respondents associated many negative outcomes with DTCA including unbalanced information, inappropriate requests to doctors and consumer confusion.

History

Citation

Hall, D. V., Jones, S. C. & Hoek, J. (2010). Direct to consumer advertising versus disease awareness advertising: Consumer perspectives from down under. Journal of Public Affairs, 11 (1), 60-69.

Journal title

Journal of Public Affairs

Volume

11

Issue

1

Pagination

60-69

Publisher website/DOI

Language

English

RIS ID

34690

Usage metrics

    Categories

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC