University of Wollongong
Browse

Deadly censorship games: keeping a tight lid on the euthanasia debate

Download (733.55 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2024-11-13, 22:36 authored by Brian MartinBrian Martin
TALKING ABOUT DEATH AND DYING - Why don’t we talk about death and dying? We can choose so many of our life experiences, but it seems we can have no say in whether we die in pain or at peace. Today we look at the Australian government’s efforts to suppress discussion of euthanasia. There’s plenty of information available on how to kill yourself violently, so why does the Australian government so vigorously censor information on peaceful methods? Voluntary euthanasia societies have long been pushing to legalise death with dignity. According to opinion polls, a strong majority of Australians support legalisation, yet Australian governments have been unreceptive. When the Northern Territory government legalised euthanasia in 1996, the federal parliament overruled the law less than a year later. Philip Nitschke, despairing of the legal route, set up Exit International to enable people to learn how to obtain a peaceful death through their own initiative. Exit publications provide information about obtaining pentobarbital, commonly known as Nembutal, the drug of choice everywhere that death with dignity is legal.

History

Citation

Martin, B. (2011). Deadly censorship games: keeping a tight lid on the euthanasia debate. The Conversation, (21 November)

Journal title

The Conversation

Issue

21/11/2024

Language

English

RIS ID

92178

Usage metrics

    Categories

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC