University of Wollongong
Browse

Cutting penalty rates was supposed to create jobs. It hasn’t, and here’s why not

Download (507.33 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2024-11-14, 06:37 authored by Martin O'BrienMartin O'Brien
After three years of submissions, hearings and deliberations, Australia’s workplace relations umpire, the Fair Work Commission, decided in 2017 to decrease the penalty rates paid to retail and hospitality workers on the safety-net award for working on Sundays and public holidays. For years employer groups had argued that high penalty rates (up to double standard pay) were an unaffordable anachronism in the modern economy, and the commission essentially agreed. In particular, it concluded the evidence was that cutting penalty rates (by between a quarter and a half) would lead to more trading hours and services on offer on Sundays and public holidays, “and an increase in overall hours worked”. In other words, reducing penalty rates would create more jobs. Two years on, with cuts to public holiday penalty rates fully implemented and Sundays partially implemented (being introduced over three to four years) how many extra jobs have been created? Our research suggests basically none.

History

Citation

O'Brien, M. (2019). Cutting penalty rates was supposed to create jobs. It hasn’t, and here’s why not. The Conversation, 16 May 1-8.

Journal title

The Conversation

Volume

16/05/2024

Pagination

1-8

Language

English

RIS ID

136458

Usage metrics

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Keywords

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC