University of Wollongong
Browse

Behavioral and fMRI evidence of the differing cognitive load of domain-specific assessments

Download (821.44 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2024-11-14, 17:54 authored by Steven HowardSteven Howard, H Burianova, John Ehrich, Lisa KervinLisa Kervin, Alysha CalleiaAlysha Calleia, Emma Barkus, John Carmody, S Humphry
Standards-referenced educational reform has increased the prevalence of standardized testing; however, whether these tests accurately measure students' competencies has been questioned. This may be due to domain-specific assessments placing a differing domain-general cognitive load on test-takers. To investigate this possibility, functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) was used to identify and quantify the neural correlates of performance on current, international standardized methods of spelling assessment. Out-of-scanner testing was used to further examine differences in assessment results. Results provide converging evidence that: (a) the spelling assessments differed in the cognitive load placed on test-takers; (b) performance decreased with increasing cognitive load of the assessment; and (c) brain regions associated with working memory were more highly activated during performance of assessments that were higher in cognitive load. These findings suggest that assessment design should optimize the cognitive load placed on test-takers, to ensure students' results are an accurate reflection of their true levels of competency.

History

Citation

Howard, S. J., Burianova, H., Ehrich, J., Kervin, L., Calleia, A., Barkus, E., Carmody, J. & Humphry, S. (2015). Behavioral and fMRI evidence of the differing cognitive load of domain-specific assessments. Neuroscience, 297 38-46.

Journal title

Neuroscience

Volume

297

Pagination

38-46

Language

English

RIS ID

99796

Usage metrics

    Categories

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC