University of Wollongong
Browse

A reconciliation for the future of psychiatry: Both folk psychology and cognitive science

Download (283.45 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2024-11-15, 17:03 authored by Daniel HuttoDaniel Hutto
Philosophy of psychiatry faces a tough choice between two competing ways of understanding mental disorders. The folk psychology (FP) view puts our everyday normative conceptual scheme in the driver's seat - on the assumption that it, and it only, tells us what mental disorders are (1). Opposing this, the scientific image (SI) view (2, 3) holds that our understanding of mental disorders must come, wholly and solely, from the sciences of the mind, unfettered by FP. This paper argues that the FP view is problematic because it is too limited: There is more to the mind than FP allows; hence, we must look beyond FP for properly deep and illuminating explanations of mental disorders. SI promises just this. But when cast in its standard cognitivist formulations, SI is unnecessarily and unjustifiably neurocentric. After rejecting both the FP view, in its pure form, and SI view, in its popular cognitivist renderings, this paper concludes that a more liberal version of SI can accommodate what is best in both views - once SI is so formulated and the FP view properly edited and significantly revised, the two views can be reconciled and combined to provide a sound philosophical basis for a future psychiatry.

History

Citation

Hutto, D. D. (2016). A reconciliation for the future of psychiatry: Both folk psychology and cognitive science. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 7 (12), 1-12.

Journal title

Frontiers in Psychiatry

Volume

7

Issue

FEB

Language

English

RIS ID

107208

Usage metrics

    Categories

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC