University of Wollongong
Browse

A comparative study of the direct boundary element method and the dual reciprocity boundary element method in solving the Helmholtz equation

Download (1009.5 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2024-11-15, 03:40 authored by Song-Ping ZhuSong-Ping Zhu, Yinglong Zhang
In this paper, we compare the direct boundary element method (BEM) and the dual reciprocity boundary element method (DRBEM) for solving the direct interior Helmholtz problem, in terms of their numerical accuracy and efficiency, as well as their applicability and reliability in the frequency domain. For BEM formulation, there are two possible choices for fundamental solutions, which can lead to quite different conclusions in terms of their reliability in the frequency domain. For DRBEM formulation, it is shown that although the DBREM can correctly predict eigenfrequencies even for higher modes, it fails to yield a reasonably accurate numerical solution for the problem when the frequency is higher than the first eigenfrequency

History

Citation

Zhu, S. & Zhang, Y. (2007). A comparative study of the direct boundary element method and the dual reciprocity boundary element method in solving the Helmholtz equation. ANZIAM Journal, (49), 131-150.

Journal title

ANZIAM Journal

Volume

49

Issue

1

Pagination

131-150

Language

English

RIS ID

22159

Usage metrics

    Categories

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC