This study was conducted to test alternative explanations for the powerful positive effect of the presenter’s facial attractiveness on persuasion found by Patzer (1985). The explanations tested are: (a) a “conscious Patzer effect” whereby the attractiveness of the presenter prompts conscious cognitive-response inferences about the presenter’s expertise and trustworthiness; (b) a “subconscious Patzer effect” whereby attractiveness persuades via beliefs about the presenter’s expertise and trustworthiness but without conscious cognitive responses; (c) an “affect transfer effect” whereby attractiveness increases liking of the presenter which in turn transfers to a more favorable attitude toward the brand; and (d) a “role-model identification effect” whereby attractiveness increases identification.
History
Citation
Praxmarer, S. & Rossiter, J. R. (2009). How does the presenter''s physical attractiveness persuade? A test of alternative explanations. Proceedings of the Australian and New Zealand Marketing Academy Conference (pp. 1-7). Melbourne, Australia: Australian & New Zealand Marketing Academy.
Parent title
Australian and New Zealand Marketing Academy Conference