University of Wollongong
Browse

File(s) not publicly available

The Eldorado effect: reappraising the “Oil Factor” in maritime boundary disputes

chapter
posted on 2024-11-16, 05:41 authored by Clive SchofieldClive Schofield
Where overlapping claims to maritime jurisdiction exist, suggestions that the disputed zone is ‘oil rich’ frequently follow. Accordingly, the potential existence of seabed energy resources underlying ocean spaces subject to overlapping claims to maritime jurisdiction often plays an important role in maritime boundary disputes. Of course other valuable marine resources, most obviously fisheries, are often also at stake. However, the possible presence of oil seems to provide a particularly compelling lure. The perception that such resources exist and that a State’s vital national interests are therefore engaged, can serve as a powerful factor motivating policy-makers to robustly defend territorial and maritime claims. While it can be argued that the suspected presence of valuable seabed hydrocarbons resources can act as a spur to dispute settlement such that the interested parties can gain access to such resources as soon as possible, all too frequently the opposite effect can be observed. That is, the essential willingness to compromise in order to reach an agreed solution tends to be undermined by concerns that to do so will leave crucial seabed energy resources on the ‘wrong side of the line’ as it were.

Funding

The Limits of maritime jurisdiction: overcoming uncertainties and safeguarding Australia's interests

Australian Research Council

Find out more...

History

Citation

C. Schofield, 'The Eldorado effect: reappraising the “Oil Factor” in maritime boundary disputes' in C. Schofield, S. Prof S Lee & M. Kwon(ed), The Limits of Maritime Jurisdiction (2014) 111-126.

Pagination

111-126

Language

English

Notes

ISBN: 9789004262584

RIS ID

89611

Usage metrics

    Categories

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC