Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)
School of Biological Sciences - Faculty of Science
Sherman, Craig D. H, The importance of fine-scale environmental heterogeneity in determining levels of genotypic diversity and local adaptation, PhD thesis, School of Biological Sciences, University of Wollongong, 2006. http://ro.uow.edu.au/theses/505
Fine-scale environmental heterogeneity is predicted to be important in determining variation in genotypic diversity and in selection for important life history traits in natural populations. For example, theory suggests that organisms with complex life histories that involve both sexual and asexual modes of reproduction use sex to produce genotypically diverse and widely dispersed propagules for the colonisation of distant or unstable habitats, but rely on asexual reproduction to restock or maintain populations within their parental habitat. Such organisms should also have great potential for site-specific adaptation as multiple generations may compete within relatively static conditions. Surprisingly, little is still known about the importance of fine-scale genotypic variation and the degree of local adaptation within populations of clonal marine organisms. In this study, I used two brooding corals (Pocillopora damicornis and Seriatopora hystrix) and one brooding sea anemone (Actinia tenebrosa), to test for evidence of fine-scale adaptation and the effects of environmental heterogeneity on variation in genotypic diversity. Using a combination of genetic and experimental techniques I assessed: i) if reproductive mode varies with environmental heterogeneity across habitats, ii) how genotypic diversity varies over fine spatial scales (centimetres and meters), and iii) if different clonal genotypes show evidence of fine-scale adaptation to specific habitats. My data on the population genetics and mode of reproduction for the corals P. damicornis and S. hystrix did not support theoretical predictions. Brooded larvae from P. damicornis colonies collected in five reef habitats were all produced asexually. In contrast, brooded larvae of Seriatopora hystrix were sexually produced, with up to three sires contributing to some broods (rp (�SE) = 0.32 � 0.43), and almost half (46%) of the larvae resulting from self-fertilisation (mean outcrossing rates were tm (�SE) = 0.54 � 0.22). The population genetic structure of S. hystrix from One Tree Island matched that expected from the mating system; i.e. a high level of genetic subdivision due to restricted dispersal of gametes, and consistent heterozygote deficits within populations associated with inbreeding. However, populations of P. damicornis showed unexpectedly high levels of genotypic diversity and appear to be maintained by sexual reproduction; Go/Ge ranged from 69 to 100% of that expected for random mating within 14 sites across six habitats. Interestingly, at three sites in two habitats Go/Ge ranged from 35 to 53%. Two of these sites were recently bleached, suggesting that asexual recruitment may be favoured after disturbance, although disturbance alone is probably insufficient to explain this species� continued investment in clonal reproduction. Using a combination of variable microsatellite and allozyme markers, I assessed the genetic origin of brooded juveniles from adult Actinia tenebrosa collected from boulder and rock pool habitats to determine if the mode of reproduction varied with environment. Brooded juveniles displayed identical multi-locus genotypes to that of the brood parent, irrespective of habitat type or location. However, I found that the level of genotypic diversity varied widely among 19 A. tenebrosa populations across 2500km of its geographic range along the east coast of Australia. Some populations showing high levels of clonality while others displayed the level of genotypic diversity expected for sexual reproduction. For A. tenebrosa, my results indicate that the importance of sexual and asexual reproduction may indeed vary among habitats with different levels of heterogeneity confirming predictions from evolutionary theory. Fine-scale genetic surveys (<1m2) on the distribution of clones of A. tenebrosa revealed that clonal diversity was greater on individual boulders (71%) compared to rock pools (23%). However, samples collected over larger spatial scales (25m2) revealed little difference in genotypic diversity between boulder (80%) and rock pool habitats (70%). Clones had limited distributions, although some could be spread throughout an entire habitat. With the exception of a single clone, I found no overlap of genotypes between boulder and rock pool habitats on the same rocky shore. This distinct segregation of genotypes to habitats within the same rocky shore may result either from highly limited dispersal of asexual propagules and/or fine-scale selection for certain genotypes in particular habitats. To test for evidence of local adaptation to fine-scale environmental variation in different habitats, I reciprocally transplanted A. tenebrosa both within and between habitats. I found no evidence of adaptation of clones within habitats, with transplanted anemones performing equally well to native anemones in terms of survivorship (F1, 0.01 = 11.79, P = 0.075), proportion of adults brooding juveniles (F1, 0.01 = 0.40, P = 0.592), mean number of juveniles/site (F1, 2281 = 0.801, P = 0.068), mean number of juveniles/brood (F1, 12.2 = 1.238, P = 0.382), and growth (F1, 0.03 = 0.007, P = 0.942). However, between-habitat transplants provided evidence that clones of A. tenebrosa are locally adapted at the habitat scale. Native anemones consistently out-performed foreign anemones transplanted from the adjacent habitat (survivorship F2, 0.298 = 9.58, P < 0.001; proportion adults brooding F2, 0.139 = 3.12, P = 0.05; mean number of juveniles/site F2, 14039 = 3.90, P = 0.028; growth F2, = 4.77, P = 0.014). In summary, the results from this study show little evidence that reproductive mode varies predictably among habitats for any of the three species tested. Furthermore, there appears to be a mismatch between the population genetic structure and the reproductive output for two of the three species. Level of genotypic diversity was shown to vary over different spatial scales, and with habitat to some degree, both in P. damicornis and A. tenebrosa, and transplant experiments provide evidence of fine-scale adaptation to specific habitats for A. tenebrosa. These results suggest that for some species, such as the brooding sea anemone Actinia tenebrosa, the importance of sexual and asexual reproduction may indeed vary among habitats with different environmental heterogeneity in the manner predicted by evolutionary theory.
02Whole.pdf (960 kB)