RIS ID
25371
Abstract
In this paper, I critically discuss a number of arguments made by John Kekes, in a recent article, against the claim that those of us who are relatively affluent ought to do something for those living in absolute poverty in developing countries. There are, I argue, a variety of problems with Kekes' arguments, but one common thread stems from Kekes' failure to take account of the empirical research that has been conducted on the issues which he discusses.
Publication Details
Horton, K. 2004, 'Famine and fanaticism: A response to Kekes', Philosophy, vol. 79, no. 2, pp. 319-327.