Home > assh > kunapipi > Vol. 25 (2003) > Iss. 1
Abstract
On receiving the Nobel Prize for Literature in 2001, V.S. Naipaul responded by paying tribute to England, '(his) home', and India, 'the home of (his) ancestors' {The Guardian 2001). Oddly enough, Trinidad does not merit a mention in Naipaul's tribute — though he was born and grew up in Trinidad, and though it is the home of his most admired early work such as The Mystic Masseur (1957), Miguel Street (1959) and A House for Mr Biswas (1961). Or perhaps it is not so odd, considering Naipaul has written, 'I knew Trinidad to be unimportant, uncreative, cynical', with 'an indifference to virtue as well as vice' (1962 43, 58). Yet this is especially poignant, considering that in the same essay, Naipaul notes; 'Living in a borrowed culture, the West Indian, more than most, needs writers to tell him who he is and where he stands' (1962 73).
Recommended Citation
Hariharan, Githa, The Ignoble Politics of Naipaul's Nobel, Kunapipi, 25(1), 2003.
Available at:https://ro.uow.edu.au/kunapipi/vol25/iss1/19
