Title

Density variation during respiration affects PET quantitation in the lung

RIS ID

110531

Publication Details

Holman, B. F., Cuplov, V., Bertolli, O., Groves, A. M., Hutton, B. F. & Thielemans, K. (2015). Density variation during respiration affects PET quantitation in the lung. 2015 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (NSS/MIC) (pp. 1-3). United States: IEEE.

Abstract

PET quantitation depends on the accuracy of the CT-derived attenuation correction map. In the lung, respiration leads to both positional and density mismatches, causing PET quantitation errors at lung borders but also within the whole lung. The aim of this work is to determine the extent of the associated errors on the measured time activity curves (TACs) and the corresponding kinetic parameter estimates. 5 patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis underwent dynamic 18F-FDG PET and cine-CT imaging as part of an ongoing study. The cine-CT was amplitude gated using PCA techniques to produce end expiration (EXP), end inspiration (INS) and mid-breathing cycle (MID) gates representative of a short clinical CT acquisition. The ungated PET data were reconstructed with each CT gate and the TACs and kinetic parameters compared. Patient representative XCAT simulations with varying lung density, both with and without motion, were also produced to represent the above study allowing comparison of true to measured results. In all cases, the obtained PET TACs differed with each CT gate. For ROIs internal to the lung, the effect was dominated by changes in density, as opposed to motion. The errors in the TACs varied with time, providing evidence that errors due to attenuation mismatch depend on activity distribution. In the simulations, some kinetic parameters were over- and under-estimated by a factor of 2 in the INS and EXP gates respectively. For the patients, the maximum variation in kinetic parameters was 20%. Our results show that whole lung density changes during the respiratory cycle have a significant impact on PET quantitation. This is especially true of the kinetic parameter estimates as the extent of the error is dependent on tracer distribution which varies with time. It is therefore vital to use matched PET/CT for attenuation correction.

Please refer to publisher version or contact your library.

Share

COinS
 

Link to publisher version (DOI)

http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/NSSMIC.2015.7582029