MAVIS ROBERTSON hopes her article (ALR No. 28) will "provoke some reaction". It has. This is not an attempt to lay clown a programme for the Women’s Liberation movement, but to dispose of some popular fallacies, and clear the ground for a constructive approach. Comrade Robertson rightly condemns the lunatic “anti-man" fringe of the movement, but seems inclined toward the more wide-spread and equally fallacious view that, to prove themselves equal to men, women must prove themselves almost identical with men.
Recommended CitationRudkin, Arthur W., Discussion: Men and Women: Equality and Difference, Australian Left Review, 1(30), 1971, 39-41.