Reply to “Response: Board Composition and Firm Performance: Evidence from Bangladesh - A Sceptical View”

Authors

Afzalur Rashid, University of Southern QueenslandFollow
Anura De Zoysa, University of Wollongong, AustraliaFollow
Sudhir Lodh, University of Wollongong, AustraliaFollow
Kathy Rudkin, University of WollongongFollow

Abstract

This paper replies to Chowdhury’s (2010) response to the paper "Board Composition and Firm Performance: Evidence from Bangladesh" (2010). It challenges the strength of the criticisms, arguing that the factors discussed in Chowdhury (2010) do not necessarily impair the outcome of the research. The authors elucidate issues raised, and in so doing, reproduce the results incorporating the commentator’s suggestions.

Recommended Citation

Rashid, Afzalur; De Zoysa, Anura; Lodh, Sudhir; and Rudkin, Kathy, Reply to “Response: Board Composition and Firm Performance: Evidence from Bangladesh - A Sceptical View”, Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal, 6(3), 2012, 121-131.