Abstract

This paper uses neo-institutional theory to examine the rise and fall of performance indicators adopted as an element of public accountability by Australian universities. We argue that performance indicators were adopted as a symbolic gesture to satisfy the need for externally conferred legitimacy and to demonstrate accountability to various stakeholders through publication in the university’s annual report. Also, because adoption was symbolic and universities were coerced by the Australian Federal Government, the reporting was curtailed when the coercive pressures were relaxed or removed.

Share

COinS
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.